&lt;p&gt;However, from the comments:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;We have not submitted it yet to the Apple App Store. However, we hope that Apple will not deny their users a choice in Web browsing experience.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;There are plenty of third-party web browsers in the App Store. It&amp;#8217;s just that the ones that are allowed are ones that use the system version of WebKit. See &lt;a href="http://daringfireball.net/2008/11/opera_app_store"&gt;this piece I wrote back in November 2008&lt;/a&gt; for more on Opera Mini, including why it might be a very cool app.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Opera Mini for iPhone to Be Previewed at Mobile Web Congress’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/10/opera-mini"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://macworldexpo.com/"&gt;Macworld Expo&lt;/a&gt; 2010 kicks off tomorrow in San Francisco. Is it going to fly without Apple? I don&amp;#8217;t know. I don&amp;#8217;t think anyone does yet. Apple&amp;#8217;s traditional presence at Macworld was so large, both figuratively (with the attention paid to their keynote address) and literally (with their massive booth on the show floor), that their absence has effectively rendered Macworld a new event. I think it&amp;#8217;s smart that IDG moved the date back a month; anything they could do to emphasize that it&amp;#8217;s going to be new and different this year can only help. (I have no idea if it was feasible, but if it had been, I&amp;#8217;d have advised moving the show across the street to Moscone West, just to make it &lt;em&gt;look&lt;/em&gt; different, too.)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Apple&amp;#8217;s absence will be felt in two ways. First, the lack of an Apple keynote address has significantly diminished the amount of media attention. That was inevitable. But it wasn&amp;#8217;t really Macworld Expo, the trade show and conference, that was garnering that attention. It was Apple itself. Apple&amp;#8217;s keynotes really didn&amp;#8217;t have much at all to do with the exhibit floor or conference sessions. I suppose there were some number of attendees who considered attending the keynote as a major reason to buy a conference pass, but percentage-wise only a small number of attendees could ever see the keynotes in person. It&amp;#8217;s not like Apple hasn&amp;#8217;t given us much to talk about recently &amp;#8212; hello, iPad &amp;#8212; it just wasn&amp;#8217;t announced at Macworld itself.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The more worrisome factor for me is Apple&amp;#8217;s absence from the show floor. They had a huge booth in a prominent spot and they drew people in. The role they played on the show floor is very much analogous, I think, to the role played by a big department store like Macy&amp;#8217;s or Nordstrom at a shopping mall.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;To me, though, the reason to walk the show floor has always been about the small companies &amp;#8212; often the &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; small ones. The ones where the employees manning the booth are the engineers and designers who made the product they&amp;#8217;re promoting. I&amp;#8217;ve been to a bunch of Macworld Expos and I never once failed to discover at least one fascinating product by walking the show floor. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In terms of what&amp;#8217;s going on other than the trade show, I&amp;#8217;ve long thought that the inordinate amount of front-loaded attention paid to Apple&amp;#8217;s keynote address drew attention away from the fact that Macworld has turned into a large and successful conference, with tracks spanning everything from programming to graphic design.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Nothing could replace a Steve Jobs keynote address, so, wisely, they&amp;#8217;re not trying. Instead, Macworld has scheduled a &lt;a href="http://macworldexpo.com/fp"&gt;bunch of featured speakers&lt;/a&gt; throughout the week, including David Pogue, Kevin Smith (yes, &lt;a href="http://www.viewaskew.com/"&gt;that Kevin Smith&lt;/a&gt;), Leo Laporte, and, yours truly. &lt;a href="http://macworldexpo.com/sessions?s=QSHOWA0005AZ"&gt;I&amp;#8217;ll be speaking Friday at 4:30pm&lt;/a&gt;, where I&amp;#8217;ll share the secret recipes for my award-winning cupcakes and melt-in-your-mouth croissants.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;(DF readers: you can register for the show using the discount code &amp;#8220;GRUBER&amp;#8221; to get a &lt;em&gt;free&lt;/em&gt; expo pass that will get you into my talk (and the show floor, and the other feature presentations). That code is also good for a 20 percent discount on any of the conferences. Just keep in mind that with that code, it&amp;#8217;s &lt;em&gt;totally free&lt;/em&gt; to come see my talk and the other feature presentations.)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The bottom line for me is that the potential is there for Macworld to remain a great show. Imagine if there&amp;#8217;d never been a Macworld Expo before, and that this was the first year. It wouldn&amp;#8217;t be surprising that Apple declined to participate. But is there demand for a days-long nerdfest for Mac and iPhone professionals and aficionados? I say yes.&lt;/p&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Some good questions &lt;a href="http://www.scripting.com/stories/2010/01/31/whatIfFlashWereAnOpenStand.html"&gt;from Dave Winer regarding Apple, Adobe, and Flash&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;What if Apple were trying to erase something that&amp;#8217;s not company-owned? Either a formal or de facto standard? Further, what if their alternative were something that was locked-down and owned by a company? Further, what if the company was Apple?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;d say that&amp;#8217;d be a different ball of wax entirely. It would depend, for one thing, on the specific open / de facto standard technology.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But as for open &lt;em&gt;web&lt;/em&gt; standards, the evidence &amp;#8212; actions and shipping code, not just words &amp;#8212; strongly indicate that Apple is a major proponent of them. Apple didn&amp;#8217;t have to release WebKit as an open source project &amp;#8212; they could have kept their extensions atop the LGPL-licensed WebCore private.&lt;sup id="fnr1-2010-02-01"&gt;&lt;a href="#fn1-2010-02-01"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; They&amp;#8217;ve re-written WebKit&amp;#8217;s JavaScript engine from scratch at least twice, and released it all as open source. (Apple has also been aggressive about releasing its advanced non-web developer technology, &lt;a href="http://developer.apple.com/mac/library/DOCUMENTATION/Cocoa/Conceptual/Blocks/Articles/00_Introduction.html"&gt;like blocks and LLVM&lt;/a&gt;, as liberally-licensed open source.) All of Apple&amp;#8217;s top competitors in the mobile space have either already adopted WebKit or soon will: Android, WebOS, even BlackBerry. Members of Apple&amp;#8217;s WebKit team have been helping drive HTML5 since its inception. In short, I&amp;#8217;d say Apple likes its technology open and its products closed.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;E.g., it makes all the difference in the world that Apple is pushing H.264 rather than, say, QuickTime as the way forward for embedded web video.&lt;sup id="fnr2-2010-02-01"&gt;&lt;a href="#fn2-2010-02-01"&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I do understand &lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/31/ipad-review-comments-naughton"&gt;the fear&lt;/a&gt;. It&amp;#8217;s indisputable that Apple seeks large amounts of control over its products. So it&amp;#8217;s a reasonable question to ask whether Apple sees the web itself, which they have no control over, as a problem. I don&amp;#8217;t think that&amp;#8217;s the case at all, though. The web, as a whole, is arguably the single most entrenched computer technology ever created. So where Apple seeks control with regard to the web is in the technology to render it &amp;#8212; HTML, CSS, JavaScript. No one can tell them what to do with WebKit; they wait for no one to shape and bend WebKit to suit their needs.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;My feeling is not that Apple seeks total control over all content and software in iPhone OS. I&amp;#8217;d say it&amp;#8217;s more like they&amp;#8217;re providing two well-defined, nice, neat, easily-understood extremes: the totally controlled native Cocoa Touch, and the totally open web.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Winer ends with a suggestion for Adobe:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Adobe might want to consider, right now, very quickly, giving Flash to the public domain. Disclaim all patents, open source all code, etc etc. That would throw the ball squarely back into Apple&amp;#8217;s court and would frame the question right now in its most stark terms.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;That&amp;#8217;d be an interesting move, and it would certainly shake things up. But what if the source code to Flash Player is &amp;#8212; as many would wager &amp;#8212; a huge steaming pile of convoluted C++ horseshit? It&amp;#8217;s sort of like what if Microsoft open-sourced the Internet Explorer rendering engine. It&amp;#8217;s not like anyone who is now using WebKit or Gecko would switch to that just because it was opened &amp;#8212; or that WebKit, Mozilla, and Opera would suddenly be obligated to or even interested in adopting IE-specific web features.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The problem for Flash is just like the problem for IE &amp;#8212; the web has already moved on.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div class="footnotes"&gt; &lt;hr /&gt; &lt;ol&gt; &lt;li id="fn1-2010-02-01"&gt; &lt;p&gt;An earlier version of this article stated that the entirety of WebKit is BSD-licensed. That&amp;#8217;s wrong; the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KHTML"&gt;KHTML library&lt;/a&gt; that Apple started with is LGPL-licensed, and so therefore is the WebCore component in WebKit. We regret the error.&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="#fnr1-2010-02-01" class="footnoteBackLink" title="Jump back to footnote 1 in the text."&gt;&amp;#8617;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/li&gt; &lt;li id="fn2-2010-02-01"&gt; &lt;p&gt;H.264 is an open standard, but admittedly and unfortunately &lt;a href="http://shaver.off.net/diary/2010/01/23/html5-video-and-codecs/"&gt;not a free standard&lt;/a&gt;, hence Mozilla&amp;#8217;s opposition to it. My point here is simply that H.264 is not owned by Apple or any other single company.&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="#fnr2-2010-02-01" class="footnoteBackLink" title="Jump back to footnote 2 in the text."&gt;&amp;#8617;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ol&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Robert Scoble &lt;a href="http://scobleizer.com/2010/01/30/can-flash-be-saved/"&gt;has a good analogy&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Let’s go back a few years to when Firefox was just coming on the scene. Remember that? I remember that it didn’t work with a ton of websites. Things like banks, e-commerce sites, and others. Why not? Because those sites were coded specifically for the dominant Internet Explorer back then.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Some people thought Firefox was going to fail because of these broken links. Just like &lt;a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/flashplatform/2010/01/apples_ipad_--_a_broken_link.html"&gt;Adobe is trying to say that Apple’s iPad is going to fail&lt;/a&gt; because of its own set of broken links.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But just a few years later and have you seen a site that doesn’t work on Firefox? I haven’t.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;What happened? Firefox FORCED developers to get on board with the standards-based web.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The same thing is happening now, based on my talks with developers: they are not including Flash in their future web plans any longer.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Regarding those blue boxes that indicate embedded Flash content in MobileSafari, think of it this way: Who can make them go away?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ol&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Adobe can&amp;#8217;t. They can&amp;#8217;t put Flash Player on iPhone OS on their own.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Apple could, &lt;a href="http://daringfireball.net/2010/01/apple_adobe_flash"&gt;but they won&amp;#8217;t&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Users could make Apple change its mind by refusing to buy iPhones, iPod Touches, and iPads because they don&amp;#8217;t support Flash. That does not seem to be happening. In fact, iPhone sales are accelerating.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Web site producers could do it, by replacing or providing an alternative to the Flash content on their sites.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ol&gt; &lt;p&gt;Adobe&amp;#8217;s &lt;a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/01/29/porno-flash"&gt;initial reaction to the iPad&lt;/a&gt; seems to be geared toward #3 &amp;#8212; emphasizing publicly that iPhone OS devices are not capable of rendering the (admittedly, substantial amounts of) Flash content on the web today. Good luck with that.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Adobe&amp;#8217;s fear, of course, is that #4 is what will happen. And with good reason, since I think it&amp;#8217;s fair to say that we&amp;#8217;re seeing this happen already. Flash evangelist Lee Brimelow &lt;a href="http://theflashblog.com/?p=1703"&gt;made his little poster&lt;/a&gt; showing what a bunch of Flash-using web sites look like without Flash without actually looking to see how they render on MobileSafari. Ends up a bunch of them, including the porno site, already have iPhone-optimized versions with no blue boxes, and video that plays just fine as straight-up H.264. iPhone visitors to these sites have no idea they&amp;#8217;re missing anything because, well, they&amp;#8217;re not missing anything. For a few other of the sites Brimelow cited, like Disney and Spongebob Squarepants, there are dedicated native iPhone apps.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kigiphoto/4314276957/"&gt;Kendall Helmstetter Gelner put together this version&lt;/a&gt; of Brimelow&amp;#8217;s chart using actual screenshots from MobileSafari, the App Store, and native iPhone apps. The only two blue boxes left: FarmVille and Hulu.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The explanation is simple. Web site producers tend to be practical. Those that use Flash do so not because they&amp;#8217;re Flash proponents, but because Flash is easy and ubiquitous. Few technologies get to 100 percent market penetration; Flash came remarkably close. A few years ago you could say that, effectively, Flash was everywhere. It made total sense for sites like YouTube and Hulu to go with Flash.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Flash is no longer ubiquitous. There&amp;#8217;s a big difference between &amp;#8220;everywhere&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;almost everywhere&amp;#8221;. Adobe&amp;#8217;s own statistics on Flash&amp;#8217;s market penetration &lt;a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/player_census/flashplayer/version_penetration.html"&gt;claim 99 percent penetration&lt;/a&gt; as of last month. That&amp;#8217;s because, according to their &lt;a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/player_census/methodology/"&gt;survey methodology&lt;/a&gt;, they&amp;#8217;re only counting &amp;#8220;PCs&amp;#8221; &amp;#8212; which ignores the entire sort of devices which have brought about this debate. Adobe is arguing that Flash is installed on 99 percent of all web browsers that support Flash, not 99 percent of all web browsers.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Used to be you could argue that Flash, whatever its merits, delivered content to the entire audience you cared about. That&amp;#8217;s no longer true, and Adobe&amp;#8217;s Flash penetration is shrinking with each iPhone OS device Apple sells.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;What&amp;#8217;s Hulu going to do? Sit there and wait? Whine about the blue boxes? Or do the practical thing and write software that delivers video to iPhone OS? The answer is obvious. Hulu doesn&amp;#8217;t care about what&amp;#8217;s good for Adobe. They care about what&amp;#8217;s good for Hulu. Hulu isn&amp;#8217;t a &lt;em&gt;Flash&lt;/em&gt; site, it&amp;#8217;s a &lt;em&gt;video&lt;/em&gt; site. Developers go where the users are.&lt;/p&gt; </content>

&lt;h2&gt;Automatic Transmission&lt;/h2&gt; &lt;p&gt;Used to be that to drive a car, you, the driver, needed to operate a clutch pedal and gear shifter and manually change gears for the transmission as you accelerated and decelerated. Then came the automatic transmission. With an automatic, the transmission is entirely abstracted away. The clutch is gone. To go faster, you just press harder on the gas pedal.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;That&amp;#8217;s where Apple is taking computing. A car with an automatic transmission still shifts gears; the driver just doesn&amp;#8217;t need to know about it. A computer running iPhone OS still has a hierarchical file system; the user just never sees it.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;That&amp;#8217;s not to say there aren&amp;#8217;t trade-offs involved. Car enthusiasts (and genuine experts like race car drivers) still drive cars with manual transmissions. They offer more control; they&amp;#8217;re more efficient. But the vast majority of cars sold today are automatics. So too it&amp;#8217;ll be with computers. Eventually, the vast majority will be like the iPad in terms of the degree to which the underlying &lt;em&gt;computer&lt;/em&gt; is abstracted away. Manual computers, like the Mac and Windows PCs, will slowly shift from the standard to the niche, something of interest only to experts and enthusiasts and developers.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h2&gt;Popovers and Split Views&lt;/h2&gt; &lt;p&gt;Across the iPad system, Apple has introduced a new UI element, which they&amp;#8217;re calling popovers. It&amp;#8217;s a perfect name. Popovers are like a cross between dialog boxes, drop-down menus, and inspector palettes. One example is the list of mailboxes in Mail when in vertical mode. When iPad Mail is in horizontal mode, you see a split view with two panels at once: accounts/mailboxes/messages on the left, and an always-present message detail panel on the right. When iPad Mail is in vertical mode, you just get one panel, but you can tap a button at the top left to show a popover of messages in the current mailbox.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;They&amp;#8217;re very well thought-out. As their name implies, they appear on-screen &amp;#8220;over&amp;#8221; existing views. But you can&amp;#8217;t drag them around. They aren&amp;#8217;t windows. They&amp;#8217;re in a fixed position, always with an arrow pointing to the button or other control (like an event in Calendar) that the user tapped to open the popover. To close a popover, you just tap away from it &amp;#8212; tapping anywhere other than within the popover closes it. Perhaps conceptually, it&amp;#8217;s more like tapping the view &lt;em&gt;under&lt;/em&gt; the popover to make it disappear. So popovers don&amp;#8217;t have an &amp;#8220;X&amp;#8221; button in the top-left corner, or anything explicitly labeled &amp;#8220;Close&amp;#8221; or &amp;#8220;Cancel&amp;#8221; or &amp;#8220;Done&amp;#8221;. You just tap away. This is one of those aspects of the iPad UI that you just have to &lt;em&gt;feel&lt;/em&gt; to get. It feels perfect.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;According to the iPad Human Interface Guidelines (which, alas, are only available to registered iPhone SDK developers), there is a modal variant:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Popovers and modal views are similar, in the sense that people typically can’t interact with the main view while a popover or modal view is open. But a modal view is always modal, whereas a popover can be used in two different ways:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Modal, in which case the popover dims the screen area around it and requires an explicit dismissal. This behavior is very similar to that of a modal view, but a popover’s appearance tends to give the experience a lighter weight.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Non-modal, in which case the popover does not dim the screen area around it and people can tap outside its bounds to dismiss it. This behavior makes a non-modal popover seem like another view in the application, not a separate state.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#8217;t recall encountering the modal variety during my all-too-brief iPad spelunking expedition; the non-modal ones seem far more prevalent.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The overall effect of popovers is that you do &lt;em&gt;far&lt;/em&gt; less view switching in an iPad app than you do an iPhone app. Things that slide an entirely new full-screen view on screen on the iPhone &amp;#8212; like say going back from a message to a list of messages, or displaying your Safari bookmarks, or showing the details of a calendar event &amp;#8212; on the iPad instead appear as popovers on a main view.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So imagine, say, an iPad Twitter client in horizontal mode. You could have a split view with a list of tweets running down the left. On the right, you could have a web view for reading web pages linked from tweets. Rather than sliding over and replacing the tweet list, they could exist side-by-side. And then a popover could provide an interface for switching between different accounts.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h2&gt;Information Density&lt;/h2&gt; &lt;p&gt;The iPad display offers 1024&amp;#8201;&amp;#215;&amp;#8201;768 pixels. At 9.7 inches diagonally, the pixel density is roughly 132 pixels per inch. That&amp;#8217;s less than the iPhone and iPod Touch, which have 480&amp;#8201;&amp;#215;&amp;#8201;320 displays with roughly 162 pixels per inch. So text looks a little less sharp on the iPad. But it seemed to me that I naturally held it further away from my face than I do my iPhone, such that it seems just about equally sharp &lt;em&gt;effectively&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;What I found interesting is that I&amp;#8217;m very familiar with this resolution &amp;#8212; for &lt;em&gt;years&lt;/em&gt; I used PowerBooks and iBooks with 1024&amp;#8201;&amp;#215;&amp;#8201;768 displays running Mac OS 9 or Mac OS X. 1024&amp;#8201;&amp;#215;&amp;#8201;768 somehow seems very different on the iPad than on Mac OS &amp;#8212; physically smaller but conceptually bigger. The full-screen concept, without Mac-style overlapping draggable windows, leaves the iPad free to use as many pixels as possible for display &lt;em&gt;content&lt;/em&gt; rather than UI chrome.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;With the iPad Calendar app for example, the month view seemed more efficient and information-dense than iCal running on my 1440&amp;#8201;&amp;#215;&amp;#8201;900 pixel MacBook Pro display.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Also interesting is iPad Safari. Even though the screen offers the same pixel count as what was once the standard size for a laptop display, iPad Safari renders pages like iPhone Safari. The web surfing experience is all about zooming and panning.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h2&gt;Hardware Keyboard Support&lt;/h2&gt; &lt;p&gt;The announcement that most surprised me is the iPad&amp;#8217;s support for hardware keyboards &amp;#8212; not just the new docking unit, but also Bluetooth keyboards. I&amp;#8217;m surprised because it is a very practical decision, but not elegant. There&amp;#8217;s a certain beauty to how, with the iPhone and iPod Touch, input is completely and utterly limited to the touchscreen.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Needless to say, though, I&amp;#8217;m surprised in a happy way. I can totally imagine traveling to conferences (or events like this) without a MacBook, but rather with an iPad and a keyboard.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The on-screen iPad keyboard is not bad at all, for what it is, but it&amp;#8217;s exactly what you think &amp;#8212; it&amp;#8217;s for &lt;em&gt;pecking&lt;/em&gt; not &lt;em&gt;typing&lt;/em&gt;. If you want to do actual writing, you&amp;#8217;re going to want a hardware keyboard.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Having used the hardware keyboard yesterday, though, it is clearly a secondary form of input. You cannot even vaguely drive the iPad interface by keyboard alone. It is almost entirely only for text input. The arrow keys really only work for text editing. Shift-arrow combos work for selecting ranges of text, and Command-arrow combos work for moving the insertion point to the beginning/end of lines. Option-arrow combos do not work for moving a word at a time, though.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Arrow keys don&amp;#8217;t work for navigating the interface. This is the sort of thing I expect to improve over time (and who knows, maybe even before it actually ships), but there are some glaring holes. For example, in iPad Mail, when you start typing in the To: field to address a message, and the iPhone-style autocomplete suggestion list appears under the field, you cannot select from it using the keyboard. You have to touch the screen. The docking keyboard has no Esc key, replacing it instead with a key to simulate the iPad Home button. But so if you try to dismiss a popover with &amp;#8220;Esc&amp;#8221; and hit that button, boom, you&amp;#8217;re dropped back to the home screen. And once back at the home screen, there doesn&amp;#8217;t seem to be a way to launch apps via keyboard alone. It just seems like it&amp;#8217;s not finished yet.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h2&gt;Typography and iBooks&lt;/h2&gt; &lt;p&gt;The iPad&amp;#8217;s version of iPhone OS contains more fonts than iPhone OS 3.1, including my beloved Gill Sans. The iBooks app lets you switch the text face, but only from a choice of five fonts.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;iBooks uses full-justified layout for books, with no apparent option to switch to ragged right. It doesn&amp;#8217;t do hyphenation, so you wind up with very unsightly word-spacing gaps. No e-reader I&amp;#8217;m aware of does justice to proper book typography, but I was hoping for better from Apple. It&amp;#8217;s decent web-caliber typography, not print-caliber typography.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;As for Amazon, they might wind up delighted with this thing. Apple&amp;#8217;s in the business of selling devices first, content second. I think Amazon is in the content business first, the device business second. A world where Kindle hardware sales pale in comparison to the iPad but where there&amp;#8217;s a very popular Kindle app for iPad that competes against iBooks is not a bad situation for Amazon. Apple is only selling e-books for use on their own devices; Amazon is willing to sell e-books anywhere they can.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h2&gt;Money on the Table&lt;/h2&gt; &lt;p&gt;Lastly, a thought regarding the iPad&amp;#8217;s aggressive pricing. Apple is obviously leaving money on the table here. They could easily charge $999 as the starting price and have hundreds of people lined up outside every Apple Store ready to buy one on day one. Then they could drop the price later in the year, as the holiday season approaches.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Clearly they&amp;#8217;re more interested in unit sales than per-unit margin. The mobile computing landscape is in land-grab mode, and Apple is trying to stake out a long-term dominating position.&lt;/p&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;There was a meta-message in today&amp;#8217;s Apple event, not about the iPad in particular, but rather about Apple as a whole. Jobs&amp;#8217;s brief preamble included a bit of extra emphasis on the fact that the Apple now generates over $50 billion per year in revenue. (Apple also emphasized this $50 billion revenue thing in their &lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/01/25results.html"&gt;PR two days&lt;/a&gt; ago announcing their Q1 2010 financial results.) He also said that when you consider MacBooks as &amp;#8220;mobile&amp;#8221; devices, Apple generates more revenue from mobile hardware than any other company in the world; the three competitors he singled out were Sony, Samsung, and Nokia. The adjective he used was &amp;#8220;bigger&amp;#8221;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Lastly, there&amp;#8217;s the fact that the iPad is using a new CPU designed and made by Apple itself: the Apple A4. This is a huge deal. I got about 20 blessed minutes of time using the iPad demo units Apple had at the event today, and if I had to sum up the device with one word, that word would be &amp;#8220;fast&amp;#8221;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;It is fast, fast, fast. The hardware really does feel like a big iPhone &amp;#8212; and a big &lt;em&gt;original&lt;/em&gt; iPhone at that, with the aluminum back. (I have never liked the plastic 3G/S iPhones as much as the original in terms of how it feels in my hand.) I expected the screen size to be the biggest differentiating factor in how the iPad feels compared to an iPhone, but I think the speed difference is just as big a factor. Web pages render so fast it was hard to believe. After using the iPhone so much for two and a half years, I&amp;#8217;ve become accustomed to web pages rendering (relative to the Mac) slowly. On the iPad, they seem to render nearly instantly. (802.11n Wi-Fi helps too.)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The Maps app is crazy fast. Apps launch fast. Scrolling is fast. The Photos app is fast.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The iPad hardware is exactly what you think. It looks great, it feels great. It&amp;#8217;s very nice to hold. (People are &lt;a href="http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2010/01/27/apple-drops-an-idud.aspx"&gt;complaining&lt;/a&gt; about the wide bezel around the display, but without that, where would your thumbs go? You don&amp;#8217;t want your thumb that&amp;#8217;s holding the device to cover on-screen content or register as a touch. Trust me, it&amp;#8217;s just right.) Just like with the iPhone, it&amp;#8217;s all in the software. And the software is obviously marvelous in many ways. It is clearly the result of deep thought and hard work.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But: everyone I spoke to in the press room was raving first and foremost about the speed. None of us could shut up about it. It feels impossibly fast. (And our next thought: What happens if Apple has figured out a way to make a CPU like A4 that fits in an iPhone? If they pull that off for this year&amp;#8217;s new iPhone, look out.)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Apple doesn&amp;#8217;t talk much about the technical details of the iPhone. They never talk about CPU speed or the name of the chip being used. They don&amp;#8217;t tell you how much RAM is in there. Part of their vision for moving computers from technical culture to popular culture is about getting away from defining these things by their technical specs. So the prominent talk about A4 is telling. This is something they want us to notice.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I mentioned this year-ago quote from Apple COO Tim Cook the other day, but it&amp;#8217;s apt here, too. &lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jun2009/tc20090621_038917_page_2.htm"&gt;Cook told BusinessWeek&lt;/a&gt;, &amp;#8220;We believe in the simple, not the complex. We believe that we need to own and control the primary technologies behind the products we make, and participate only in markets where we can make a significant contribution.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Apple now owns and controls their own mobile CPUs. There aren&amp;#8217;t many companies in the world that can say that. And from what I saw today, Apple doesn&amp;#8217;t just own and control &lt;em&gt;a&lt;/em&gt; mobile CPU, they own and control the hands-down best mobile CPU in the world. Software aside (which is a huge thing to put aside), it may well be that no other company could make a device today matching the price, size, and performance of the iPad. They&amp;#8217;re not getting into the CPU business for kicks, they&amp;#8217;re getting into it to kick ass.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;They&amp;#8217;re Microsoft and Intel rolled into one when it comes to mobile computing. In the pre-taped video Apple showed, Bob Mansfield said of the iPad, &amp;#8220;No one else could do it.&amp;#8221; Only Apple.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;And so my takeaway from this &amp;#8212; with the bragging about making their own CPUs and their annual revenue and their size compared to companies like Sony, Samsung, and Nokia &amp;#8212; is that this is Apple&amp;#8217;s way of asserting that they&amp;#8217;re taking over the penthouse suite as the strongest and best company in the whole ones-and-zeroes racket.&lt;/p&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;On my flight to San Francisco yesterday, I finished reading &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/asin/1578062977/ref=nosim/daringfirebal-20"&gt;Stanley Kubrick Interviews&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, an excellent collection edited by Gene D. Phillips. I was struck by this passage by Richard Schickel from Time magazine in 1975, a few weeks prior to the release of &lt;em&gt;Barry Lyndon&lt;/em&gt;:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;About his work Kubrick is the most self-conscious and rational of men. His eccentricities &amp;#8212; secretiveness, a great need for privacy &amp;#8212; are caused by his intense awareness of time&amp;#8217;s relentless passage. He wants to use time to &amp;#8220;create a string of masterpieces&amp;#8221;, as an acquaintance puts it. Social status means nothing to him, money is simply a tool of his trade.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Reminds me of &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/gruber/4307703430/"&gt;someone else&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Patrick Burgoyne:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;After 29 years, MTV unveils a logo &amp;#8216;refresh&amp;#8217; – like many of its viewers, the network has become a little wider and a little fatter.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Creative Review on MTV&amp;#8217;s Tweaked Logo’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/11/mtv-logos"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;New site for tech and design news. I dig it.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Tputh’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/10/tputh"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Nice chart from Alley Insider, showing Microsoft&amp;#8217;s operating profit by division.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘In Case You Had Any Doubts About Where Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Profit Comes From’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/10/frommer-microsoft"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;I missed this last month. Ends up a financial analyst last month really did issue a pre-preliminary estimate of how much it&amp;#8217;s costing Apple to manufacture the iPad &amp;#8212; &lt;em&gt;three weeks before Apple announced it&lt;/em&gt;. (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/lgerbarg/status/8925185690"&gt;Via Louis Gerbarg&lt;/a&gt;.)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘I&amp;#8217;m Too Late’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/10/ipad-pre-preliminary"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Holman W. Jenkins Jr. on the iPad:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;And what about Apple&amp;#8217;s decision to exclude Flash? Apple and its supporters stake out aesthetic and philosophical grounds: Flash is buggy. Flash is a power hog. Flash is &amp;#8220;proprietary&amp;#8221; (horrors). Flash is used to create those annoying Web ads (never mind that advertising is what pays for most of the Web).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Uh huh. Flash would also allow iPhone and iPad users to consume video and other entertainment without going through iTunes. Flash would let users freely obtain the kinds of features they can only get now at the Apple App Store.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;So his argument is that no matter how bad Flash is technically and experience-wise, Apple should add it to the iPad so people can watch Hulu. And that there&amp;#8217;s no other way to obtain video for the iPad other than stuff you buy from iTunes. Jiminy. If only there were, say, a YouTube app included with the OS.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I suppose that if you really miss things like Hulu and animated web ads, it makes sense to argue that Apple should support Flash on iPhone OS no matter what. I honestly don&amp;#8217;t see how anything regarding the iPad, the iTunes Store, or Apple&amp;#8217;s policy toward Flash is in any way reminiscent of Microsoft, though. I&amp;#8217;d say the iPad only serves to bring into relief just how different the two companies have become. Perhaps what Jenkins is getting at is Apple&amp;#8217;s willingness to impose its will, to make decisions rather than offer choices.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘WSJ Op-Ed Piece by Holman W. Jenkins Jr. Argues Apple Is Getting All Microsofty’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/10/jenkins"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Apple didn&amp;#8217;t emphasize this heavily at the introduction, but the iBooks app is not going to be bundled with the iPad &amp;#8212; it&amp;#8217;s an app you download from the App Store, putting it on an (at least somewhat) equal footing to e-book readers from other companies. From the &amp;#8220;Features&amp;#8221; page in Apple&amp;#8217;s iPad web site:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;The iBooks app is a great new way to read and buy books. Download the free app from the App Store and buy everything from classics to best sellers from the built-in iBookstore.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;If you look at the &lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/ipad/gallery/"&gt;photos of the iPad&lt;/a&gt;, the only bundled apps included with the system appear to be Calendar, Contacts, Notes, Maps, Videos, YouTube, iTunes, App Store, Settings, Safari, Mail, Photos, and iPod. Perhaps this will change if and when iBooks becomes available outside the U.S.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Update:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/perfy/status/8929095037"&gt;Good point&lt;/a&gt; from a reader on Twitter: making iBooks an App Store download will allow Apple to update the app more frequently than if it were tied to OS updates.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘iBooks Isn&amp;#8217;t Bundled With iPad’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/10/ibooks"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Ian Youngs, reporting for BBC News:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Record label Warner Music has said it will stop licensing its songs to free music streaming services. Companies like Spotify, We7 and Last.fm give free, legal and instant access to millions of songs, funded by adverts.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Warner, one of the four major labels, whose artists include REM and Michael Buble, said such services were &amp;#8220;clearly not positive for the industry&amp;#8221;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Update:&lt;/strong&gt; Spotify, on Twitter, &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/Spotify/status/8919825963"&gt;says Warner isn&amp;#8217;t pulling out&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Warner Retreats From Free Music Streaming’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/10/warner"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;No sarcasm intended, I&amp;#8217;m enjoying Thurrott&amp;#8217;s perspective on the iPad. I found this perspective intriguing:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Further unclear is why we would want to learn yet another user interface. Phones, by nature, are simple to use and limited by onscreen real estate. Laptops, of course, offer more expansive screens and more powerful capabilities. But the iPad introduces yet another UI, one that is based on that of the iPhone, of course, but one that is different and more advanced (and complex). Not as advanced and complex as a PC, perhaps. But different from both the iPhone and laptop.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;The starting point Thurrott is espousing here, more or less &amp;#8220;&lt;em&gt;Let&amp;#8217;s start with something the user will already be familiar with&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#8221; sounds good, and many times it is the right approach. That&amp;#8217;s the consistency argument for Mac software being Mac-like, and Windows software being Windows-like. But if you shackle yourself to starting with something already familiar, then the state-of-the-art is never going to make a great leap forward. This sort of thinking is why Microsoft&amp;#8217;s tablet computers all run Windows 7.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Clearly, the way Apple approached the iPad was that &lt;em&gt;of course&lt;/em&gt; the iPad was going to introduce a new UI. They&amp;#8217;re really rather fearless about it, because, I think, they&amp;#8217;re so confident in its obviousness. Unfamiliar and new isn&amp;#8217;t a problem if the whole thing is obvious and easy to figure out.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Paul Thurrott, Warming to iPad’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/10/thurrott"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Insightful reporting based on interviews with current and former Microsoft employees:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;#8220;When I started at MSFT in 1996, there were six people between me and [Microsoft cofounder] Bill Gates,&amp;#8221; Boris said. &amp;#8220;In 2009, there were 13 people between me and [Microsoft CEO] Steve Ballmer.&amp;#8221; Fred said, &amp;#8220;the number of managers between me and the CEO went from six to 10,&amp;#8221; during the last decade. Another long-time Microsoftie, whom I&amp;#8217;ll call Barry, saw his reports go from six to 12.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Fascinating stuff, too, about the bizarre incentive structure for Microsoft employees. I think this gets to the nut of exactly what&amp;#8217;s wrong with Microsoft. They&amp;#8217;ve evolved a powerful, deep bureaucracy that has lost any sort of focus on creating great products. Worse, for obvious reasons Microsoft&amp;#8217;s management is unlikely to see itself as the problem. As Upton Sinclair said, &amp;#8220;It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Joe Wilcox on Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Glut of Middle Managers’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/10/wilcox"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Google:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;We&amp;#8217;re planning to build and test ultra high-speed broadband networks in a small number of trial locations across the United States. We&amp;#8217;ll deliver Internet speeds more than 100 times faster than what most Americans have access to today with 1 gigabit per second, fiber-to-the-home connections. We plan to offer service at a competitive price to at least 50,000 and potentially up to 500,000 people.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Google Announces Experimental Fiber Network’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/10/google-fiber"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Arik Hesseldahl on a &amp;#8220;preliminary estimate&amp;#8221; of iPad component costs from iSuppli:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Research firms including iSuppli conduct so-called teardown analysis of consumer electronics to determine component prices and makers and estimate margins. Researchers at iSuppli didn&amp;#8217;t have an actual iPad and instead relied on Apple&amp;#8217;s public statements on its features.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;The next step, I guess, is issuing &amp;#8220;pre-preliminary estimates&amp;#8221; of component costs for products that haven&amp;#8217;t even yet been announced.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Remember the Old Days, When iSuppli Would Actually Wait Until They Could Take a New Apple Device Apart Before Making Up a Ridiculously Lowball Estimate for How Much It Costs to Make?’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/10/isuppli"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;My thanks to Sourcebits for sponsoring this week’s DF RSS feed. Sourcebits is a contract developer specializing in iPhone, mobile, Mac, and Web software. Their iPhone apps have been downloaded over 4.5 million times from the App Store, and they have a growing list of Android and BlackBerry apps, too. If you’re looking for software development services, check out Sourcebits’s web site for examples of their work, and contact them for a quote.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Sourcebits’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/12/sourcebits"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Fascinating. ReadWriteWeb has a weblog post that ranks highly in Google&amp;#8217;s search results for &amp;#8220;Facebook login&amp;#8221;. The comments on the post are filled with complaints from confused people who think that this is the new Facebook login page.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;It&amp;#8217;s funny, yes, but it&amp;#8217;s a fascinating glimpse at just how confused many people are about how web sites and browsers work. They don&amp;#8217;t use bookmarks, they don&amp;#8217;t type &amp;#8220;facebook.com&amp;#8221; in the location field. They just Google for whatever they&amp;#8217;re looking for and assume the first result is correct. All this argument over whether the iPad is too simple &amp;#8212; if anything it&amp;#8217;s probably still too complex.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘&amp;#8216;Facebook Login&amp;#8217;’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/11/facebook-login"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Kottke:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Sales of CJ Corporation&amp;#8217;s snack sausages are on the increase in South Korea because of the cold weather; they are useful as a meat stylus for those who don&amp;#8217;t want to take off their gloves to use their iPhones.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Meat Stylus for the iPhone’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/11/kottke"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Interesting perspective: looks like they sell about 100 songs per second.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘iTunes 10 Billionth Song Countdown’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/11/itunes-10b"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Another little masterpiece from my friend Adam Lisagor.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Introduction to Square’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/11/square"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Better and better.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘SublimeVideo Now Supports Firefox’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/11/sublimevideo"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Now with support for extensions.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘New Beta of Google Chrome for Mac’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/11/chrome-mac"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Kara Swisher on the dwindling enthusiasm for Windows Mobile:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Indeed, this is why Microsoft and its giant wallet might be better served by buying one of the big and more established telecom companies, such as Research in Motion, Palm or even &amp;#8212; as another Microsoft exec said to me, “Why not?” &amp;#8212; Nokia.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Nokia has a market cap of close to $50 billion, with RIM at close to $38 billion. And Palm? A paltry $1.74 billion. Microsoft’s current valuation is $246 billion, and the company has $40 billion in cash and marketable securities on hand. [&amp;#8230;] And, in fact, many sources at Microsoft have told me that CEO Steve Ballmer has expressed interest in buying RIM many times (while also dismissing any interest in Palm).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;RIM seems like a natural fit, in terms of its customer base and the whole look and feel of BlackBerry software. Palm would be the bolder play.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Kara Swisher on Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Mobile Dilemma’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/11/swisher"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Bill Hill, formerly of Microsoft:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;The trouble is trying to innovate at Microsoft, which is a company of geeks, run by geeks, and dominated by Windows.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;When TabletPC began at Microsoft, it was a research effort - outside of the regular Windows organization. Once it was re-organized into Windows, that was the kiss of death. I never really thought much about this while I worked there, but it&amp;#8217;s my belief that despite all the lip-service paid to end-users, the only Windows customers with any real power are the Windows Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Bill Hill on the iPad’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/11/bill-hill"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Jason Kincaid nails it: &amp;#8220;write once, run everywhere&amp;#8221; has never worked out. It&amp;#8217;s a pipe dream. More laughably, this initiative comes from mobile carriers, not OS vendors. It&amp;#8217;ll never pan out.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘The Wholesale Applications Community’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/15/kincaid"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Simon St. Laurent on the process forging HTML5:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;HTML5 will be damaged, its credibility weakened, but will still be important, one way or another.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Yeah, I sure wish HTML5 were going more like, say, the W3C&amp;#8217;s XHTML 2.0 spec. That worked out great.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Update:&lt;/strong&gt; Mark Pilgrim says to &lt;a href="http://is.gd/8su1Q"&gt;look at primary sources&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘The Widening HTML5 Chasm’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/15/html5-chasm"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Ian Hickson:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Since I was mistaken about the formal objection, should I prepare the drafts for FPWD publication now? What date should I use?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Either this was all a major mistake and misunderstanding, or Hickson is calling Adobe&amp;#8217;s bluff.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Ian Hickson on Adobe and HTML5’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/15/hixie-adobe"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Adobe&amp;#8217;s Larry Masinter, in &lt;a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/adobe-html5-objections-95496864#comment-66680"&gt;a comment on 9 to 5 Mac&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;No part of HTML5 is, or was ever, &amp;#8220;blocked&amp;#8221; in the W3C HTML Working Group &amp;#8212; not HTML5, not Canvas 2D Graphics, not Microdata, not Video &amp;#8212; not by me, not by Adobe.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Neither Adobe nor I oppose, are fighting, are trying to stop, slow down, hinder, oppose, or harm HTML5, Canvas 2D Graphics, Microdata, video in HTML, or any of the other significant features in HTML5.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Claims otherwise are false. Any other disclaimers needed?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Great news.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Adobe Claims Not to Be Blocking Anything Related to HTML5’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/15/html5-adobe-not-blocking"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;The best, most precious photographs tell stories, eliciting visceral recollections of the people, places and times that matter to you. MemoryMiner is an extremely clever photo-annotation and storytelling tool that helps you take the long view, highlighting the connections between peoples&amp;#8217; lives across time and place. Like cooking, writing or gardening, MemoryMiner takes some effort, but offers unique rewards for every step you take. To see how, watch the demo screen movie found on the home page of &lt;a href="http://memoryminer.com/?df"&gt;memoryminer.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Daring Fireball readers can purchase MemoryMiner at a &amp;#8220;one finger&amp;#8221; (i.e. 20%) discount using the coupon code &amp;#8220;daring&amp;#8221;.&lt;/p&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;In public, Adobe claims to &amp;#8220;support&amp;#8221; HTML5. On the private W3C mailing list, though, they&amp;#8217;ve placed an objection to prevent the current spec from being published. My understanding is that Adobe is trying to block the API spec for the canvas element. The canvas element hasn&amp;#8217;t gotten as much attention as the video element, but clearly, 2D graphics in canvas is competitive with Flash, and it appears that Adobe&amp;#8217;s plan is to sabotage it via W3C politics.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Adobe Puts Secret Hold on HTML5 Spec ’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/14/hixie"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Seems like a terrible mistake to glom a public broadcasting feature onto a private email system.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Google Buzz a Privacy Disaster’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/13/google-buzz"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Brad Stone, reporting for the NYT:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Apple’s chief executive is set to collaborate on an authorized biography, to be written by Walter Isaacson, the former managing editor of Time magazine, according to two people briefed on the project.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘NYT: Steve Jobs Cooperating on Biography by Walter Isaacson’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/15/jobs-isaacson"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;What a great product name. Not a mouthful at all.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Windows Phone 7 Series’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/15/windows-phone-7-series"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Steven Frank:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;This is such a perfectly encapsulated nutshell of exactly why Apple does not allow third-party background processes on the iPhone.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Homebrew App for the Palm Pre Reboots Your Phone on a Schedule’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/15/homebrew-palm-reboot"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Chris O&amp;#8217;Brien:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;This column began when I tried to find the answer to what I thought would be a simple question: How many job cuts has Hewlett-Packard had over the past decade?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The answer shocked me: 75,505.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;That includes people who were fired or took early retirement. Despite the cuts, HP&amp;#8217;s workforce has tripled in size as the company hired people in new areas and bought companies such as Compaq and EDS.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Lessons From Hewlett-Packard&amp;#8217;s Massive Job Cuts’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/15/hp-jobs"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Me too.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘A Conversation Dan Wineman Has Every Month or So’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/16/wineman"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Ed Finkler:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;When folks need an elevator, we should give them an elevator, not an airplane. We’ve been giving them airplanes for 30 years, and then laughing at them for being too stupid to fly them right.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘&amp;#8216;We’re the Stupid Ones&amp;#8217;’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/16/finkler"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Luke Wroblewski compares the Windows Mobile 7 photos and app store apps to their iPhone counterparts.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Information Resolution on the Windows Phone 7 Series’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/16/lukew"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Tonio Loewald:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;This is procedural bullshit, plain and simple.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;I know Adobe claims they&amp;#8217;re not &amp;#8220;blocking&amp;#8221; anything related to HTML5, and many of you are taking them at their word on this. I hope you&amp;#8217;re right. But they are undeniably doing &lt;em&gt;something&lt;/em&gt; behind the scenes with, as Loewald eloquently boils it down, W3C procedural bullshit. Adobe can call it &amp;#8220;seeking clarification&amp;#8221; or whatever they want. I say it&amp;#8217;s obstruction.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I think they&amp;#8217;re trying to get the W3C to agree that 2D canvas is not part of &amp;#8220;HTML5&amp;#8221; proper as a first step.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Tonio Loewald on Adobe and HTML5’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/16/adobe-loewald"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Every major mobile platform is now either using WebKit or will be soon. Except for one.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘RIM Previews WebKit Browser for BlackBerrys’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/16/webkit-rim"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;I love the New York Times, and the iPad app demo they gave last month looked great, but $360 a year is insane. It&amp;#8217;s a simple choice between playing for the (digital) future and temporarily propping up the (print) past.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Gawker Reports on NYT Turf Battle Over iPad App Pricing ’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/16/gawker"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;At least it wasn&amp;#8217;t Flash.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Report Claims Malicious PDF Files Comprised 80 Percent of All Exploits for 2009’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/16/pdf"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Josh Topolsky:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;The design and layout of 7 Series&amp;#8217; UI (internally called Metro) is really quite original, utilizing what one of the designers (Albert Shum, formerly of Nike) calls an &amp;#8220;authentically digital&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;chromeless&amp;#8221; experience. What does that mean? Well we can tell you what it doesn&amp;#8217;t mean &amp;#8212; no shaded icons, no faux 3D or drop shadows, no busy backgrounds (no backgrounds at all), and very little visual flair besides clean typography and transition animations. The whole look is strangely reminiscent of a terminal display (maybe Microsoft is recalling its DOS roots here) &amp;#8212; almost Tron-like in its primary color simplicity. To us, it&amp;#8217;s rather exciting. This OS looks nothing like anything else on the market, and we think that&amp;#8217;s to its advantage.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Certainly interesting and original. My first impression, though, is that if nothing looks like a button, and tappable text looks like non-tappable text, how do you know what you can tap?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Josh Topolsky&amp;#8217;s Windows Mobile 7 Impressions’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/16/topolsky"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

&lt;p&gt;Matt Buchanan:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Every phone will have a Bing (search) button and a Start button. Custom skins, like the minor miracles HTC worked, are now banned. The message to hardware makers is clear: It&amp;#8217;s a Windows Phone , you&amp;#8217;re just putting it together. Basically, phonemakers get to decide the shape of the phone, and whether or not there&amp;#8217;s a keyboard.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Microsoft&amp;#8217;s dilemma by not building their own phones: they&amp;#8217;re acknowledging that hardware matters, but if hardware matters, what&amp;#8217;s the motivation for handset makers to excel if there&amp;#8217;s nothing they can do to stand apart from others except for lowering their price? Microsoft&amp;#8217;s message to handset makers is, more or less, &amp;#8220;&lt;em&gt;You&amp;#8217;re going to do what we tell you to do and we&amp;#8217;re going to take all the credit.&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#8221; Very different from Android. Maybe that&amp;#8217;s what these handset makers want, though.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;One other word on hardware, in a manner of speaking. Hardware it won&amp;#8217;t work with? Macs. Which is kind of stupid to us &amp;#8212; a lot of the people Microsoft wants to use Windows Phone 7, like college students, have been going Mac in droves. You wanna lure them back Microsoft? Let them use your phone with any OS.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;I think Microsoft has its fingers in its ears and is doing the &lt;em&gt;na-na, can&amp;#8217;t hear you&lt;/em&gt; thing regarding Mac market share (and demographics).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Yes, the browser is Internet Exploder. And yes, the rumor&amp;#8217;s true: It won&amp;#8217;t be as fast as Mobile Safari. Not to start.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;#8220;Not to start&amp;#8221;, eh?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;History is on Microsoft&amp;#8217;s side here—we know what happened the last time Apple had a massive head start.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;Not to be a smug dick here, but wasn&amp;#8217;t the &lt;em&gt;last time&lt;/em&gt; Apple had a massive head start over Microsoft the iPod? Speaking of which, no word on whether Windows Mobile 7 phones will support PlaysForSure.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div&gt; &lt;a title="Permanent link to ‘Matt Buchanan on Windows Mobile 7’" href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/16/buchanan"&gt;&amp;nbsp;★&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt; </content>

Sonzea LLC has released Syncopation 2.1.3 for Mac OS X. Syncopation provides a hands-free solution to keep your iTunes music collection synchronized across multiple computers running Mac OS X....

On June 9, the iTunes App Store went live and users began downloading and enjoying the fruits of many developers' labor. Apple offers an extremely robust software development kit for the iPhone...

As MacRumors reports across various posts, Apple announced its financial results yesterday for the 4th quarter of fiscal 2008. It was an impressive quarter for the iPod maker. Highpoints:Apple...

As MacRumors' iPhone blog reports, Cooliris has released a free iPhone version [App Store] of their 3D "photo wall" browser plug-in that delivers a rather unique and ideal way of browsing images and...

DougScripts.com brings us iTunes Library Manager v5.2.1 for Mac OS X. This AppleScript application facilitates multiple iTunes playlists each with their own preference seettings.For example, you can...

As Macworld UK reports, Xerox and its partners have introduced the Xerox Multi-Functional Printer suite, a software package that integrates certain Xerox printers with enterprise business systems. A...

iPod nano users that pine for the 80s might want to have a look at Vancouver firm Contexture Design's retro iPod nano cases.These unique retro cases for first- and second-generation iPod nanos are...

Looking to do some iPod DJing at your next party? Is finding a cluster of "matching" songs in your library proving to be a challenge? Have a look at beaTunes v1.2.15 for Mac OS X. beaTunes lets...

As MacRumors' iPhone blog reports, Fring has released an iPhone version of their communications service today as a free App Store download [App Store].Fring allows you to chat and interact with...

It's Halloween! And here at iPod Hacks we've let the spirit of this special day take hold of us. All it took was a crisp autumn eve with leaves dancing magically on the wind, a patch of uncarved...

Equinux AG has released CoverScout v3.0.1 for Mac OS X. CoverScout strives to be a one-stop-app for finding, applying, editing and printing all of the album cover art in your iTunes music library....

Google has released a free iPhone version of its excellent Google Earth application [App Store]. And having spent some time with the app, I can safely say...it's great.With just a swipe of your...

It cost $399. It was 5GB in capacity (which Apple then called 1000 songs, but would now call 1250 songs...). It was shiny silver and white. It was brick-like (4.02" x 2.42" x 0.78", 0.41 lbs). ...